| Principle |
Rating |
Explanation |
| Open-Ended Instruction
Lessons are structured so that multiple/complex answers are possible; students are not steered toward one 'right' answer.
| Good |
- Students are either presented with scientific facts or the opportunity to complete their own research so that they can understand the water cycle and our relationship to it.
- Students research various pollutants and a variety of alternatives to become familiar with their impact on the environment. Using models or direct experience (such as a trip to a local water way, or water treatment plant) students can draw their own conclusions about human impact on water.
- Again, the focus of the module is on hazardous household waste and water. There is not a lot of attention to other causes of water pollution.
|
|---|
| Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Learning Multidisciplinary= addresses a number of different subjects
Interdisciplinary= integrated approach that blurs subject lines
Good: The resource provides opportunities for learning in a number of traditional 'subject' areas (eg. Language Arts, Science, Math, Art, etc.).
Very Good: The resource takes an integrated approach to teaching that blurs the lines between subject boundaries. | Very Good |
- Students learn about the water cycle and how ecological systems such as a watershed function.
- They examine how humans and animals affect and are affected by the health of water systems.
- There are strong applications to many subjects throughout the resource as students are required to research, explore, record and describe and present information both graphically and literally.
|
|---|
| Discovery Learning Learning activities are
constructed so that students discover and build knowledge
for themselves and develop largely on their own
an understanding of concepts, principles and relationships.
They often do this by wrestling with questions, and/or solving problems
by exploring their environment, and/or
physically manipulating objects and/or performing experiments.
- Mediocre = Students are provided with intriguing questions, materials to use &
some direction on how to find answers. The learning involves unique experience & provides
some opportunity for an 'ah-hah' event
- Good =
Students are provided with intriguing questions, materials to use, &
make their own decisions on how to find answers. The learning involves unique experience & provides
definite opportunity for an 'ah-hah' event.
- Very Good =
Students choose what questions to investigate as well as the materials/strategies
to use to answer them.
| Very Good | Students complete mind-maps along with models, simulation and research activities that are all inquiry-based. Students are encouraged to reflect on their findings in personal journals and share opinions during group discussions. |
|---|
Values Clarification Students are explicitly provided with opportunities to identify, clarify and express their own beliefs/values.
- Poor = Students are not explicitly given an opportunity to clarify their own values.
- Mediocre = Students are given a formal opportunity to clarify their own values. The range of perspectives in the resource is limited, therefore, students do not have an appropriate amount of information to clarify their own values.
| Very Good |
- After many of the activities, students either complete a personal journal entry or participate in a classroom discussion to share their learning.
- Students are encouraged to explore and consider their values and beliefs, and to make any lifestyle changes they feel would help make a difference to their use of water, and potential pollutants.
|
|---|
| Differentiated Instruction Activities address a range of learning styles/different intelligences. They teach to both cognitive and affective domains. Accommodations are suggested for people with learning difficulties. | Very Good |
- Some activities are more research-based (such as the house-hold pollutants lesson) where students complete their own research while other activities have students building models and creating simulations.
- The Yellow Fish Road painting activity offers opportunities for all students to be outside meeting members of the community and painting at storm drains as well as possibly interacting with activity volunteers.
|
|---|
Experiential Learning Direct, authentic experiences are used.
- Mediocre = simulation
- Good = authentic experience
- Very Good = authentic experience related to the primary goal of the lesson
| Very Good |
- The students complete the valuable task of educating the general public about the hazards of household toxic waste on ecosystems.
- The students also perform their own audit of what is in their home - empowering them to educate their family and suggest friendly alternatives.
- They make a lasting imprint on their community with the painting of the yellow fish symbol.
|
|---|
Cooperative Learning Group and cooperative learning strategies are a priority.
- Mediocre = students work in groups
- Good = cooperative learning skills are explicitly taught and practiced
- Very Good = cooperative learning skills are explicitly taught, practiced and assessed
| Mediocre | Students complete activities in groups although no cooperative strategies are explicitly taught (except how to reach consensus in a group and choose an action project). |
|---|
| Assessment & Evaluation Tools are provided that help students and teachers to capture formative and summative information about students' learning and performance. These tools may include reflection questions, checklists, rubrics, etc. | Good |
- Students complete personal reflections and participate in group discussions for some activities.
- They also paint a mural that demonstrates their understanding of water use.
- Students can help co-construct a rubric (suggestions provided for the teacher) for the evaluation of their model.
- They do not self assess, however, nor do they complete an activity in which they demonstrate their individual knowledge of the water cycle.
|
|---|
Peer Teaching Provides opportunities for students to actively present their knowledge and skills to peers and/or act as teachers and mentors.
- Mediocre = incidental teaching that arises from cooperative learning, presentations, etc.
- Good or Very Good = an opportunity is intentionally created to empower students to teach other students/community members. The audience is somehow reliant on the students' teaching (students are not simply ‘presenting')
| Good | In the street-painting activity, students are actively sharing their knowledge during conversations with community members. Students are also encouraged to pursue classroom visits or school-wide assemblies. No aspect of the activity allows for on-going mentorship. |
|---|
| Case Studies Relevant case studies are used. Case studies are thorough descriptions of real events in real situations that can be used to examine concepts in an authentic context. | Poor/Not considered | Poor
- It is expected that the teacher provides local information of the watershed area of the community.
- No case studies are included although there are certainly many relevant examples/case studies that could be a part of the module.
|
|---|
| Locus of Control Meaningful opportunities are provided for students to choose elements of program content, the medium in which they wish to work, and/or to go deeper into a chosen issue. | Mediocre | The activities in the module are structured and scripted. While students might pursue areas of personal interest during the website research in the house-hold toxins activity, they do not otherwise explore in an area of personal interest. Some extension activities may allow students to pursue a chosen issue. |